buggery: (Default)
Yeah, I've seen all the same scans showing that WIZARD magazine can hire utter tools to talk about (and demonstrate) drawing female comics characters that the rest of LJ-based comics fandom is frothing about today. Not gonna rant, per se. Plenty of that going on, and I just don't have the energy for a rant today.

Instead, a somewhat more zen approach:

Big Beautiful Wonder Woman, the blog of a WW fan who believes Diana is a prime example of women looking better the less they look ...well, like Michael Turner's vision of Supergirl.

All the art at BBWW is by other artists, and the blogger accepts and displays any art of Wonder Woman drawn with more heft to her than she's allowed to have officially. This means, sadly unsurprisingly, both that some of the art poses Wonder Woman like a girly pinup, and that some of it is drawn by artists who can't conceive of a fat woman being anything but unattractive.

That said, the second image currently on display (by Pedro Caraca) is possibly the least representative of the dozens of pieces of artwork contributed to BBWW; and while I wish I could say the third image (by Colin McK) is equally unrepresentative, truthfully there is a fair amount of cheesecake here -- which remains exploitative even if the women are drawn with less-unrealistic bodies, or bodies unrealistic in ways other than the comics-industry standard.

For me, though, it's worth scrolling past that crap in order to appreciate art like the image currently at the top of the page, by Tom Burgos, or like the sixth image on the current page, by Juan 'JayTee' Tesorero, or even better, less-recently-posted art like this one from July by Mike Manley of Diana -- and Clark.

Behind the cut: more somewhat-less insanely-image-heavy links for the dialup set... )

The asterisks (* to ****) beside each artist's name denote the number of stars I've rated the art by that artist in the referenced post, based on my own biased view of how offensive (*) or empowered (****) the depiction of Diana in the image is. Possibly this is of use even to those with spiffy fast connections, now that I think about it.


70s Porn Star Buddha says: Feed your soul, feed your body.
buggery: (Default)
(The text of this post originally appeared in slightly different form as a response to [livejournal.com profile] harriet_spy's comment in Te's journal here.)

Sarah said, in part:
I think women's presence in the clubhouse is going to make many otherwise decent guys somewhat uncomfortable


See, here's the thing.

I don't think the women (and others) in comics-slash fandom ARE in the comics fanboys' clubhouse.

We have our OWN clubhouse, and boys from the older, bigger clubhouse over there keep coming into OUR clubhouse and trying to act like they're in charge just because we're all sitting around reading comics in here.

We're a lot more welcoming to new people than the big clubhouse is, because we WANT as many people as we can get in here with us enjoying the same (set of -- I don't begrudge Ang her fixations on Boostle and Guy, nor Sarah or Livia their interest in the Ultimates, and I don't think anybody points and laughs much at my tastes) fun stuff that we do. It gives us more people to talk to, and more people who will hopefully contribute fiction, art, meta, or something else to the community.

You present OUR clubhouse with a new way of looking at something in canon, and -- even if we don't agree -- our response tends to be, 'Ooh, interesting! Shiny! Sit down and have some scans/meta/fiction/chatcrack!'

You say something that goes against 'conventional wisdom' someplace like the DC boards, you're likely to get smacked down: 'Batman's not gay, you weirdo!' 'Why would you like Kyle better, he's a total pussy!' 'A girl Robin was a stupid idea but at least she's dead now!' etc.



Now I have an odd perspective on this current battle of the sexes precipitated by [livejournal.com profile] scarfe's comment: I don't identify as male or female, but as something other. I probably respond to people in what's a culturally 'male' mode more often than not -- Te and I have laughed about the way I have to remember to give emotional support when friends are having problems, not just practical advice -- but I identify as a feminist (in the sense that I believe "feminism is the radical notion that women are people") and I like to think I'm a good one.

I'm not a Jackie-come-lately. I was the one who nudged Te into the comics side of DC slash fandom, and I've watched this fandom grow up around us with glee and awe.

I came from slash fandom, not from comics fandom -- I started really reading comics a little over three years ago, but never felt an urge to get fannish about them outside a fanfiction context -- so I'm used to an almost complete absence of males. In all of my past slash fandoms, you were lucky if you could find two males to rub together (though they often wouldn't have minded; as far as I can remember none of them were straight).

I find the presence of a substantial male minority -- still a minority, but a good-sized and growing one -- in this fandom exciting, and as amazing in its way as the fact that the fandom is here at all. (I said for years I'd give my left nut for a large, active Batfamily slash fandom full of talented writers, even before I started reading the comics... Of course, the only one I have is on the right, but maybe that's why...) Hell, we even have those couple of real live straight boys here, meta-ing about the homoerotic subtext and reading and even writing the occasional slash story.

In my book? That all these people are in our fandom means that we WIN.

As for the party-crashers... I don't have any practical advice to suggest for dealing with them. We're going to keep wanting new people who are interested in hanging in our clubhouse to be able to get in. Having a password to keep out boy cooties (or even rude cooties -- oh, for the days when the flamewar-fanning trolls were all female) is not going to work.

But what we can do, when they come stomping into our clubhouse and wanting to throw Te's porn in the trash or pull Houie's pinups off the walls, or even just point and laugh and call us names, is point them right back to their own clubhouse. It's bigger anyway, and if they don't enjoy what goes on here they're *welcome* to go elsewhere.

Hm, I guess I came up with practical advice after all. q:

There is NO reason whatsoever for people who don't like our club to hang out in our clubhouse -- and [livejournal.com profile] scans_daily was never a room in the big clubhouse to begin with. If anybody is only unnerved or disgusted by the few things we do here that the fanboys in the bigger, older clubhouse RIGHT over THERE don't do, then they should go there and leave us in peace. We're not here to be a convenient target for anybody's pent-up frustration at years of marginalisation (been there, done that, show of hands? yeah, thought so), and we're not here to be the subjects of anybody's armchair psychoanalysis either. We're here in OUR space to do what we enjoy doing.


[livejournal.com profile] scans_daily post in which the original incident occurred
Livia's reaction in her journal
No, I am not linking to the fandom_wank post that followed.


(Icon relevancy note: Two of the five fandoms in this icon are ones I actively participated in in the past (Smallville and due South) and which had more slash-fandom-normative demographics ...and that's Dick Grayson in the Batgirl costume.)
buggery: (Default)
So, I've been reading Judd Winick's maxiseries Caper. You haven't heard of it? Or, you have heard of it but haven't been reading it?

You will. It's a damned good book, which had me hooked before I was halfway through the first issue.

But I digress.

I haven't cut for spoilers on this post because I'm not spoiling anything by discussing what had me saying "what the fuck?!" out loud when I read the most recent issue (#11 of 12) last night. Hopefully the mature topic won't offend anyone either. Because it's the mature content, the labeling of the comic as containing such, and the subsequent handling of said content inside the book, that I'm feeling the need to rant about.

Caper has been, from the very beginning, a clearly not-for-kids book. Yes, the violence and references to sex have been decidedly inappropriate for littl'uns. If Judd has been holding back to spare any squeamish readers, it hasn't been showing.

Until issue #11.

In which, when a naked man runs out of a building, and in the following panel stands cringing and (wholly ineffectually) trying to cover himself, you can see his bare genitals flapping about. Or... you sort of can. They appear to have been digitally obscured, as if I'm reading the comic through the lens of The Jerry Springer Show or COPS.

Which frankly, DC, I didn't think I was. And it's not like naked penis has never been shown in a DC "mature readers" title before -- hell, they were letting Mike Grell get away with it during his run on Green Arrow decades ago. (Well, it was the 80s, if not quite 20 years before present.) This is the twenty-first century. This is a mature readers title. This is a medium where naked women are not infrequently shown even in titles not designated "for mature readers," and in which there's entirely too much "camel toe" in some titles that bear the stamp of Comics Code approval.

I suspect that it was Judd's original intention, and probably artist Tom Fowler's as well, to show that swinging appendage in all its profound lack of glory. Which would mean somebody at DC editorial decided even their mature readers couldn't handle it. This is hardly the first time in recent months I've been frustrated by bewildering decisions on a DC editor's part that have diminished my enjoyment of a comic I read, but it is the first one that comes down to a matter of censorship as much as of respect (or lack thereof) for the fans.

Caper set its tone early: gory, blunt, no holds barred. (And dramatic and funny as hell.) The coy obscuring of one small area in two panels of Caper #11 interrupted that tone, threw me right out of the story I had been so divertingly immersed in, and will echo jangling through the remainder of the series -- as well as hang over any subsequent "mature readers" titles DC puts out.

Shame on you, DC.

September 2007

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112 131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 22nd, 2026 07:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios